Hello everyone,
I started my readings this week with the first two chapters
of Wootfit. These chapters are basically important for us to understand the
terms “Conversation Analysis (CA)” and “Discourse Analysis (DA)”. For me, all
the readings this week are important to convince myself on understanding of the
goal of this course. Before registered for THIS COURSE, I thought that “DISCOURSE”
Analysis will help me to discover more than “what someone says during an
interview”. It will also help me to be able to catch “what someone really means
when he or she says something during an interview”. In this respect, Wootfit’s
readings have provided me brief definitions of CA and DA, and what the
important point during a conversation, such as a telephone call. I can
understand these kinds of important points, but I am wondering how I can figure
out all time gaps during a phone call. It can be understood if we conduct an
interview via Skype or face-to-face because we can record it. Wootfit does not
mention this point in these two chapters. Also, the definition of DA hasn’t made
sense to me until I read the first chapter of Jorgensen and Philips’ book. In
that chapter, Jorgensen and Philips were explaining the purpose of Discourse
Analyst in the page 21. I think it was the best way to explain what discourse
analysis is. It was also interesting to
me that although it has been claimed that DA is the most widely used social
constructionist approaches, there hasn’t had a clear definition of the term, at
least I have had difficulty to understand. Hepburn article is a good start for
me to have an example of how to organize a paper that is about discourse
analysis. I have conducted some research so far. However, I didn’t take
emphasizes and other important points taken into account as Hepburn did. I
think and I hope the class, including class discussions, and other readings
will contribute to my understanding of discourse analysis and how to apply
discourse analysis in my field. I am not sure how I performed with my first
reflection. Therefore, I will really appreciate for your comments and
recommendations to improve my future reflections.
Thanks,
Thanks for sharing your ideas here. As I read, I wonder whether your initial idea of DA used to better know "what someone really means when he or she says something during an interview" might have shifted as you read Jorgensen and Phillips. Any thoughts on this?
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment Dr. Lester. Actually, I am not sure whether or not I am on right track. When I read Jorgensen and Phillips, the definition of DA actually made sense to me, especially the purpose of Discourse Analyst completely helped me to understand. However, there is a better definition in other readings. Maybe, since this definition is consistent with my current schema about DA, it was the most understandable definition. I am really excited about the class discussion.
ReplyDeleteThanks.